Tag archive for » Obama «

Cover-ups, Cover-ups Everywhere.

Monday, 22. November 2010 8:33

Remember the phantom “missile” that soared through the skies 30 miles off the coast of Los Angeles a couple of weeks ago?

NASA was mum. The military was mum. After a few days, the Defense Department assured us that this was a simple contrail from an airplane- nothing to worry about. Yet listen to military experts who know a thing or two about aircraft and you’ll hear a completely different story. This contrail, according to these guys, couldn’t come from an airplane because of the location, size, and shape of it. It most definitely came from a missile, probably one from a foreign country because of the color.

The color?

You see, the United States takes precautions to ensure our missiles have clean, white contrails, and this plume was loaded with dirt, giving it a brown/black hue. It seems that the most likely culprit is China, a country which just may have been sending the United States a message… possibly a message about the way we’re spending their money.

So who gave the orders to lie to the American people?

According to WND: Dr. Lyle J. Rapacki of Sentinel Intelligence Services, LLC, states “the decision to officially announce that North America was not threatened and all the excitement was due to an aircraft leaving a contrail is a decision that reaches beyond the four-star general level and goes directly to a decision made by the commander-in-chief.

Commander in Chief? Huh.

This missile incident made me think of a story my husband told me back in the late 1990′s. He had just returned from a golf outing with a high-ranking (really high) TWA executive, a man who was privy to the happenings within the company. My husband told me that this executive looked him in the eye and stated unequivocally that TWA flight 800, the one that blew up over the coast of Long Island in July, 1996 and killed 230 people was brought down by a missile.

It did not explode from an electrical problem, as we were told.

Did the government lie to us back then, too?

Bingo. It seems that our government didn’t only lie, top officials covered up, distorted, and fabricated evidence to support their lie. I know these two “missile stories” are completely different, but the level of deceit involved in each reaches all the way to the Oval Office and should make us pause….

Jack Cashill has done an enormous amount of research on what happened to TWA flight 800 and interestingly enough, his findings mirror those of the TWA executive who spoke to my husband. His discoveries found evidence of a cover-up that is even darker and more twisted than any of us could imagine….

Let’s go back to July, 1996. Elections were coming up for President Clinton in just a couple of months and it seemed as though he would cruise to an easy victory if nothing went wrong. The last thing he or Hillary needed was a devastating airplane accident, especially one that involved either friendly or enemy fire. It was much better to let the public believe that this was simply an electrical accident.

From the beginning, the National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB) felt as though a criminal act had occurred. There were 270 eyewitnesses who went to the FBI with claims of seeing a missile attack on the plane. Some took still photos, others had video. A few of the eyewitnesses were aviation experts who wouldn’t mistake a missile strike for a plume of smoke.

Almost immediately, President Clinton asked a woman by the name of Jamie Gorelick to take over the investigation of the accident. Gorelick was the Deputy Attorney General and had no experience in either aviation or conducting an investigation. The first thing she did was to take power from the NTSB and give the investigation to the FBI- a group who reported directly to her.

Although this was illegal, no one seemed to notice.

Clinton knew full-well that the FBI was inept when it came to plane accidents. The NTSB were the experts.

Which is exactly why Clinton and Gorelick wanted the NTSB out of the equation. It’s much easier to stage a cover-up with inept accomplices.

Oh, it gets better. Gorelick’s second scheme involved the media. She deliberately took news coverage away from every news outlet except the New York Times, claiming it was easier to deal with just one entity. The FBI was only allowed to feed information to the NY Times, essentially controlling the “propaganda” to an easily-controlled and sympathetic source.

Of the 270 eyewitnesses to the incident who had come forward, the NY Times interviewed …...zero.

Americans never heard the tales of these eyewitnesses.

After a 4 year “investigation” , the FBI declared that the plane had experienced an explosion in the fuel tank caused by a short circuit. The case was essentially closed.

Yet, the evidence didn’t match the final report. For example, the fuel in the airplane is inflammable. Tests done on similar fuel show that even lighting a match to the fuel will not cause it to start on fire. A simple short circuit couldn’t possibly have exploded the fuel. Also, the explosion would have caused the airplane to have exploded from the inside-out, yet the damaged wreckage clearly showed signs that the damage came from the outside-in. (indicating a missile strike). There was even evidence that the wreckage was physically altered to match the story concocted by Gorelick and Clinton.

Again, no one seemed to care.

There’s an interesting epilogue to this story: In May, 1997, Jamie Gorelick was selected to be the new Vice Chair of the Fannie Mae Board, although she didn’t have a lick of experience. She was given a paycheck of $4 Million per year for the next 6 years.

And no one asked why.

Oh, that’s not all. After September 11th, she resigned from Fannie to take one of five Democratic seats on the 9-11 Commission. Jack Cashill believes that she was “selected” for this position to keep any talk of TWA flight 800 at bay and so that no one tried to reopen up that investigation.

The cover-up remained hush-hush.

One more note of interest: Just to be sure that no one would ever connect the dots, Sandy Berger, Bill Clinton’s National Security Adviser, was sent to steal a few documents from the National Archives before he testified in front of the 9/11 commission. He stuffed his socks and loaded his pants with classified papers, which were later reported to only be “copies” of documents.

Sure.

This was all done in an effort to cover Clinton’s ass.

How many other stories have been spoon-fed to the American people? Who ordered Air Force One to do a photo shoot over NYC? Who ordered a delay to the clean up of the BP oil spill? Who ordered the Justice Department to stop the investigation of the New Black Panthers? Who hired Van Jones and did they know he was a communist? Who signed off on the release of the Lockerbie bomber? …And was there a missile launched off the coast of Los Angeles by a foreign country?….

Are we allowing the government to cover Obama’s ass, too?

How many times have we been taken for fools?

Too many times to count, folks, too many times to count.

lsm
___________________________
Go to Home Page: www.awakentheelephants.com

Category:Obama, Uncategorized, corruption, ethics, lsm, media | Comment (0) | Autor: lsm

The Desperation Of The Dems.

Thursday, 30. September 2010 7:37

Wow, are they desperate…

Knowing in advance that November will be a landslide in favor of their opponents, the democrats are pulling out all the stops. Watching them has been nothing short of a sad, comedy hour.

Let’s see, first we witnessed Stephen Colbert testifying in front of the House Judiciary Committee- in character- about illegal immigration and migrant labor. Democratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California actually thought inviting Colbert to speak was a rational idea. When Colbert was asked what gave him the credentials to appear before the committee, Mr. Colbert said, “I believe one day of me studying anything makes me an expert on something.” When asked how much a migrant worker makes, Mr. Colbert answered, “I didn’t do a good enough job to get paid, so I can’t compare my salary to anyone. I was actually asked to leave.”

This is the kind of trash that Democrats deem significant. Taking a vote that will affect taxes for the middle class and small businesses is just so “old school.”

What we now know is that Colbert’s appearance was a sham, a publicity stunt to divert the attention away from the testimony of Christopher Coates, the former top guy in the Voting Rights Division of the Department of Justice. You see, Mr. Coates, who testified the same day, is the man who can prove that the DOJ is not only corrupt, but it is downright discriminatory toward white folks.

The mainstream media, as ordered, focused their attention on Mr. Colbert’s testimony, relegating the testimony of Coates to back pages of their respective newspapers.

Mission Accomplished.

We’ve seen CBS use Justin Bieber, a young heartthrob, to smear the Tea Party movement when they cast him on an episode of CSI. In that episode, the Tea Party was portrayed as a radical, hateful, racist organization that meets in dark rooms, behind closed doors where they plot the bombing of America.

Hmm…sounds more like the Weatherman Underground.

Obviously, none of the writers, directors, or producers have ever been to a peaceful Tea Party rally, have never associated with an American who can recite the Bill of Rights.

The intent of CBS was to get little girls who think that Justin Bieber is “cute” to tune into CSI and get schooled on what their evil Tea Party parents are really doing at those rallies.

The media has become complicit.

Beautiful.

Saturday Night Live has once again been dispensed to put on their political claws and attack another threatening person in the Republican party. The number one target this election cycle seems to be Christine O’Donnell, the woman running for the Senate in Delaware. Unfortunately for SNL, the “schtick” of making every republican out to be “dumb” is getting old. We’ve seen it before with “dumb” depictions of both of the Bush presidents, as well as Dan Quayle, Bob Dole, and Sarah Palin.

Let’s think logically here. Which party is filled with small-business entrepreneurs and which one is filled with people who are looking for money from “Obama’s stash”? Which party has a congressman who thinks that the island of Guam can “tip over” if a few thousand people are added to it? Which party has a Vice President that thought the TV was a modern convenience during the time of the Great Depression?

Enough said.

Now we’re hearing that Alan Grayson, the congressman from Florida, has taken campaigning to a new low. He has run an ad where he calls his opponent, “Taliban Dan Webster” , taking statements Webster made to a religious group out of context, skewing the meaning to imply that Webster wants women to be subservient to men. The full context of the speech shows Webster actually denouncing that sentiment, telling his audience to ignore those particular passages in the Bible that infer women should be subservient.

It is another example of the lies, deceit, and desperation that the democrats are using. Through it all, Grayson’s campaign manager continues to defend the ad and says they have no intentions of pulling the smear campaign.

This ties into the theory of what we’ve heard from Bill Maher and the liberals in power: Most Americans are dumb and uneducated. If you keep telling them lies over and over, they will eventually believe them.

Where have we heard this before?

Well, it’s from our good, communist friend, Vladamir Lenin: “A lie told often enough becomes the truth.”

Now we hear that Barbara Boxer hired Day Laborers to protest her opponent, Carly Fiorina, in California. Boxer’s campaign workers made signs and then paid unemployed, non-English speaking illegals who were hanging in the vicinity to hold up the signs and pretend to protest Fiorina. They didn’t even know who Boxer was; they simply wanted the cash. We PAY illegals to rally? Isn’t that illegal?

In the ultimate of desperate tactics, Barack Obama stood before a crowd this past week and praised Jesus, claiming that he was a “Christian by choice.” Obama said he seeks to look to God through daily prayer and public service. “That’s what I strive to do. That’s what I pray to do every day,” he said. “I think my public service is part of that effort to express my Christian faith.”

A wonderful sentiment, isn’t it?

It’s taken him nearly 2 years to express his faith? This is the man who didn’t go to church on Christmas, canceled the National Day of Prayer, and announced to the world that we are “not a Christian nation.” He has yet to find a church for this “daily prayer” that he speaks of.

Why should we believe this sudden transformation?

We shouldn’t.

Communists are not only allowed to lie, it is expected of them. You see, in the communist world, the ends justify the means, and since the American masses seem to be turning toward God, then by golly, Obama is going to give them the spiritual revival that they crave.

Anything for a vote. Anything to keep his hope alive of global governance.

It’s desperation, folks. Hard to watch, hard to understand.

Stay tuned. These next few weeks could get even uglier…

lsm
_______________________
Go to Home Page: www.awakentheelephants.com

Category:Uncategorized | Comment (0) | Autor: lsm

The Mosque: To Build Or Not To Build

Monday, 16. August 2010 7:41

While there are many things in life which we have a right to do; there are also many of those things which are not right.

We have a right to go to a ballgame and stand up the entire game, keeping those behind you from seeing the game.

In most communities, we have a right to paint our house neon yellow with purple trim or to let our lawn grow to an unsightly level.

But a little thing called “morality” keeps us from doing those things. We know that our actions affect others, and to live peacefully in this world, we must, at times, think outside of our “rights” and do what is “right.”

The same logic needs to be used when it comes to the building of the mosque, the controversial structure which may go up across the street from the World Trade Center bombing site. Do the Muslims have the constitutional right to build a mosque at this site? Yes, they do. Should they use this constitutional right, dismissing the cries from Americans all over the United States who feel that this is a disrespectful act and a slap across the face of those who lost loved ones on 9/11?

Of course not.

Why? Because it isn’t right. There is absolutely no reason that this mosque can not be built in another spot which is less controversial. “Keeping the peace” often means mediating, finding a solution which will benefit all. If the purpose of the mosque is simply to have a place for Muslims to worship, then they certainly can find another spot which will fulfill their purpose and won’t offend others.

If their purpose, however, is to spit in the face of America, then they will not mediate. They will claim their constitutional right to build this facility across from the bombing site and forge ahead. If past behavior is any indication, I will predict that the Islamic clerics who are pushing for the construction of this mosque will not concede.

Especially now that they have our mighty president on their side.

Obama stood before these Muslims at his Iftar Ramadan party and gave them the green light to build their mosque wherever they darn-well please. He never mentioned that it would be a gesture of goodwill if they would simply move the location of this project down the street a few blocks, nor did he mention that relocating would be a huge step toward convincing skeptics that Islam is truly a religion of peace. He didn’t talk of the harm this mosque could do to Islamic/American relations or the wedge it could put between New Yorkers- those who were the most affected by the destruction of the Twin Towers.

No, Obama stood with the Muslims, once again.

Shocking.

Barack Hussein Obama continues to baffle those who want to believe that he is pro-American. He makes it very difficult for moderate democrats to defend him because his actions continue to fly in the face of what we’ve seen from prior presidents. We have never seen a president who refused to defend our country or the American people from a dangerous, illegal population- or one who sued one of the 50 states for defending themselves. We’ve never seen a president go abroad and denounce our country or bow to foreign leaders. We’ve never seen a president defend the actions of Black Panthers and Gitmo terrorists, yet jump at an opportunity to say the police “acted stupidly.”

It’s unprecedented.

According to Politico, the democrats who are now running in tough congressional races are frustrated by Obama’s stance: “Democrats — at least some who were willing to comment — could barely contain their frustration over Obama’s remarks, saying he had potentially placed every one of their candidates into the middle of the debate by giving GOP candidates a chance to ask them point-blank: Do you agree with Obama on the mosque, or not?”

Few democrats are offering their opinion, yet every politician who is running for office should be asked this question.

Why? Because according to a CNN poll, 2/3 of the American people oppose the mosque- and Americans have a right to know where their elected officials stand.

After taking some heat, Obama is now backing away from his comments. He claims that he wasn’t giving the green light to the Muslims, simply stating that they had a constitutional right to build wherever they’d like. Some in the GOP, including Sarah Palin, aren’t buying this turnaround. In a recent Facebook posting, Sarah asked the President: “Mr. President, should they or should they not build a mosque steps away from where radical Islamists killed 3,000 people? Please tell us your position. We all know that they have the right to do it, but should they? And, no, this is not above your pay grade.”

Interestingly enough, the controversial Imam who is pressing for the construction of the mosque is now touring the Middle East on the taxpayers’ dime. Yes, the State Department- aka, Hillary Clinton- has given this man an “all expense paid” trip as an “envoy” to the United States. He will also be given the opportunity to visit a few rich friends who might help him fund the mosque.

And these rich friends may also repay the favor to Clinton or Obama during the 2012 election cycle.

This controversy has done nothing but once again divide our nation. Just as Obama has pitted democrats against republicans, blacks against whites, illegals against legals, and rich against poor, he is now dividing us on a basis of religion. What’s sad is that it doesn’t have to be this way. If those of the Islamic faith will merely come into our country, assimilate into our culture, follow our rules, and use some common courtesy, they would go a long way toward healing the negative feelings of 9/11.

Divide and conquer- that’s the communist way. It’s difficult for communists to defeat a united nation, but relatively easy for them to exercise power over a divided mass. Obama has studied Marxism his whole life- he knows this to be true.

Our president is not a bumbling idiot who doesn’t understand the ramifications of his words. Quite the contrary.

He’s very intelligent.

And very intentional.

lsm
_______________________
Go to Home Page: www.awakentheelephants.com

Category:Islam, Obama, Uncategorized, communism, constitution, ethics, lsm | Comments (1) | Autor: lsm

Post-Racial President? Hardly.

Friday, 23. July 2010 8:42

The race card has been used one too many times.

Kind of like ” The Boy Who Cried Wolf”- it has lost its meaning. Most of us are tired of race being blamed for everything from job loss to health care to the Tea Party movement. We’re tired of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and their constant “rush to judgment” based solely on race. When they supported the woman who falsely claimed to be raped by the Duke LaCrosse players- yet were silent on the intimidation of the New Black Panthers- we’d had enough.

It’s getting worse, folks- our self-proclaimed, “post-racial” President has seen to that. We now have a man in the White House who appears to see everything in terms of black and white. Strange, isn’t it, that this man is genetically BOTH black and white, yet only embraces the black side of himself? Have we EVER heard him refer to himself as a “white” man or a “bi-racial” man? Have we ever heard him talk lovingly about his white relatives? Does he even have white relatives?

We’ve heard him refer to his grandmother on a few occasions, the most memorable of which was the time he was defending his pastor, Reverend Wright, and threw grandma, under the bus.

“I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe”.

Th sound bite did not go over well with the general population so Obama was forced to explain what he meant. You see, his comments almost sounded racist, and folks were stunned- they wanted to believe that he had simply misspoken. Barack gave another interview intending to clear up the controversy:

“The point I was making was not that my grandmother harbors any racial animosity. But she is a typical white person. If she sees somebody on the street that she doesn’t know. . .there’s a reaction in her that doesn’t go away and it comes out in the wrong way.”

What, exactly, is a “typical” white person?

The media let the story die. Other politicians were afraid to play the race card, so the story simply went away. Yet things are happening in Washington DC and in our country today which warrant another look into Obama’s past history with race…

In his book, Dreams of My Father, Barack tells a story about the marriage of his parents. He claims that his maternal grandparents, Stanley and Madelyn Dunn, were not thrilled that their daughter, Stanley Ann, had married Barack Hussein Obama, partially because of a note they received from the groom’s father. According to the memoir, Stanley Ann’s new father-in-law sent her parents a “long, nasty letter” from Kenya “saying that he didn’t approve of the marriage.” Stanley Ann later told Barack that his black grandfather “Didn’t want the Obama blood sullied by a white woman.”

Did this actually happen? We don’t know, but our President claims that it did.

Wouldn’t this make most kids- especially those who had been abandoned by their black father- even MORE protective of their white mother? Wouldn’t this make most people angry with the mentality of their black relatives?

Wouldn’t it?

In his book, Barry describes his “racial awakening” when at age 9, he opened up Life magazine and saw the picture of an “older” “black man,“in dark glasses,” who had “heavy lips” and a “broad, fleshy nose”. The accompanying article described how this black man had used lightening agents on his skin to appear white. Barack remembers a close-up of the man’s hands, severely scarred by the chemicals he had used to turn them white. The entire story was horrifying to young Barack.

One problem. The story didn’t exist. Life magazine never printed a story like that. When asked about the discrepancy, Barack dismissed it, claiming that it was probably Ebony magazine, instead.

Another problem. The story didn’t exist in Ebony, either.

The story DID exist, however, in a reverse form that was printed in both Newsweek and Time Magazines. It was the story of a WHITE man, John Howard Griffin, who wrote the best-seller, Black Like Me, where he used chemicals and ultra-violet treatments to make himself appear BLACK. There were photographs attached to the story which showed a close-up of Mr. Griffin in dark glasses, and another of his hands, darkened by the chemicals.

Just like Barack described, but in reverse.

His “Racial Awakening” moment was ficticious….

Maybe this is the moment that spurred Barack to seek out black mentors, guys like Reverend Jeremiah Wright, a man who preaches that whites are bad, whites are racists, whites owe the black man, whites are the problem with this country, and whites need to pay. In order to sit in Wright’s church for 20 years, it must have been necessary for Barack to completely dismiss the white part of his heritage. He had to find fault with his loving grandparents because they didn’t “fit in” with Wright’s version of the world.

Somewhere along the line, Barack’s idea of race was warped.

Maybe that’s why we’ve seen nothing but racial moments coming from his White House. Barack pushed through the Hate Crimes Bill. His administration has called the Tea Party “racists.” He jumped to conclusions about the white policeman in Boston who acted “stupidly.” He’s dismissed the actions of the New Black Panthers and ordered lawyers at the Department of Justice to dismiss cases where blacks are racist against whites. He has gone on record as supporting the redistribution of wealth. He believes in financial reparations for blacks.

Something to ponder: Would a biracial man, like Barack, collect reparations? Would his white half pay the black half or how does that work exactly? Are his white genes responsible for oppressing his black genes?

When does the insanity end?

It certainly didn’t end in 2008 like it was supposed to. Many in America thought “hope and change” meant that racial tensions in this country would subside. Much to the contrary, race is now being used to divide us. I can’t think of another period in my lifetime where I’ve seen the race card played so often without merit.

When the wolf actually came into the village, no one listened to the little boy….

By making everything about race, blacks are shooting themselves in the foot. No one is listening anymore. No one cares. We’re tired of hearing that we’re racist because we are white or rich or just because we exist. We’re tired of the name-calling. We’re tired.

Where’s our President?

He’s out fueling the fire.

lsm
_________________________
go to Home Page: www.awakentheelephants.com

Category:Obama, Uncategorized, lsm, racism | Comment (0) | Autor: lsm

Hollywood- Where Communist Thought Runs Amok.

Monday, 12. July 2010 7:46

The term “Hollywood liberal” is redundant.

A conservative in Hollywood? It’s not only unacceptable, it’s a direct road to the unemployment line. Most of these rarities stay “in the closet” for fear of being cast as heathens- people who hate the environment, love the war, have moral values, and worship at the foot of George Bush- all unacceptable behaviors to those who do the hiring on the Golden Coast.

Funny, but about 60 years ago, it was the communists who were banned from Hollywood. Strange…

There are actors like Leonardo Di Caprio, a guy is considered a “Hollywood expert” on “Global warming” and going “green”- despite the fact that this “genius” has never attended a day of college. In his own words, Leonardo doesn’t need college because, “Shooting movies is like going to college”.

I guess filming “The Titanic” has made him an expert on carbon emissions.

Who knew?

Cameron Diaz was spotted walking through the streets of Peru carrying a Maoist handbag, embellished with a red hammer and sickle and the words, “Serve the People” on it. Peruvians were offended, forcing Cameron to apologize.

It looks like she’ll have to save that handbag for exclusive wear in the United States, where freedom of speech still exists and uneducated citizens are unaware of the evil of Mao. Hey, you can’t blame Cameron for loving a guy who’s responsible for killing 70 million people.

If Mao made a documentary about his killing spree today, he would have earned himself an Oscar and been the toast of Hollywood parties everywhere.

Speaking of documentaries, Michael Moore has made a career of selling these films to Americans- films which glorify communism. He gave us a false depiction of the Cuban health care system in “Sicko” and recently tried to demean capitalism, the free market system through which he has lived in freedom, gotten fat, and made his fortune.

We see the moral clarity of liberals when we hear the women of The View talk about Roman Polanski, the Polish director who raped a 13 year old girl and then fled the country. When he was finally arrested in Switzerland on these charges, Whoopi Goldberg chastised our legal system, saying that what Polanski did to a 13 YEAR OLD “wasn’t ‘RAPE’ rape.” The ladies on the panel concluded that Polanski was a “brilliant director” who should be released because he seems like a nice guy.

Oh, and it happened a long time ago. Let the poor man go on to live his life.

So much for standing up for women. And children.

Rosie O’Donnell is cut from the same communist cloth as these other ladies. A few years ago, she gave us a lecture on the 2nd amendment, claiming that the amendment is outdated and was never meant to allow citizens to carry handguns. A couple of weeks later, we found out that her own bodyguard had applied for a permit to carry a gun while accompanying her son to school each morning.

She said that was “different.” Her children needed protection. Ours don’t.

Oh, and she’s also a “Truther”, a woman certain that Bush took down the twin towers. This Hollywood genius recently talked about the BP oil spill and the danger it was doing to our environment, calling on Obama to nationalize BP to solve the crisis:

“I say seize their assets. Right now. Seize their assets today. Take over the [company]. I don’t care [how]. Issue an executive order…Call it socialism, call it communism, call it anything you want. Let’s watch Rush Limbaugh explode on TV…Seize the assets. Take over BP.”

Don’t let something like the silly, old constitution get in the way of your personal opinion, Rosie.

Oliver Stone is directing a new movie about his hero, Hugo Chavez. Stone tells us that Chavez is a misunderstood man who he “deeply admires”- a great guy who lives a modest lifestyle, giving back oil profits to his people and fighting corruption at every turn.

Meanwhile, in the real world, we find out that Chavez is hoarding food in his country, sending “the food police” into the private sector to confiscate rice, coffee, and powdered milk. They’ve now discovered “mountains” of rotting food in a government warehouse, causing food prices to escalate and folks to die of hunger in his country. Chavez has recently decided to nationalize 11 U.S. Oil Rigs. Since 2007, he has nationalized companies in industries from oil to utilities, to telecoms, cement, steel and banking.

We are expected to ignore the facts and believe that Chavez has no plans of becoming a communist dictator.

“He’s a nice guy.”

Sadly, even Tom Hanks, the guy we all love, is a huge, liberal force in Hollywood. He’s publicly criticized the Mormon Church because of their stance on gay marriage, he’s ripped the Bush administration, and he’s donated big money to Al Franken and other far-left candidates.

Al Franken.

And then we have Sean Penn, a Hollywood “star” in a class of his own…..

To understand Sean, you must first know that his roots aren’t really liberal- they’re communist. His father, Leo Penn, was a member of the American Communist Party and was proven — by Soviet records — “to be an agent of direct sedition and treason against the United States on behalf of Stalin. ”

You see, Sean Penn’s father was also an actor, one who was blacklisted from Hollywood when he was found to be a communist agent. It might be said that Penn is seeking justice for what he considers to be a grave injustice against his father:

‘It just makes you angry, the idea that a guy that goes off, fights for his country, wins all kinds of medals by risking his life, and then four years later, the country says, “You can’t work here,”‘ he says. ‘And I am a total believer in: it can happen again. There’s signs of it all the time. The one thing you can count on in Hollywood – across the board – is cowardice.”

The communist apple doesn’t fall far from the communist tree.

Penn claims to know President Chavez well. He calls Chavez a “warm and friendly man with a robust sense of humor.”

Hey Sean, move to Venzuela. PLEASE. With all the money you’ve made under our capitalist system, you could have the nicest mud hut in Caracas.

Oh, and take Rosie, Leonardo, Keith Olbermann, Whoopi, Michael Moore, Cameron Diaz and her communist purse with you.

One more thing: You might want to invite Obama to join your little group. “Brilliant”, communist minds think alike…

You two have a lot in common.

lsm
_____________________________
Go to Home Page: www.awakentheelephants.com

Category:Uncategorized, communism, ethics, lsm | Comment (0) | Autor: lsm

Anybody Know About Our New Medicare Czar?

Friday, 9. July 2010 10:19

You have the right to vote for whomever you wish.

You also have a right to know what you’re voting for. Our mainstream media is not doing its job, not even slightly. While evidence is popping up every day showing the current White House to be a socialist, out-of-step, radically inspired administration, there are only a handful of media outlets that are giving Americans even a smidgen of that information.

Worse yet, most are helping our President with his leftist agenda. Tales of Lindsay Lohan’s antics, “The Bachelor’s” new conquest, and Lebron’s nail-biting decision fill the airwaves of the liberal media, giving a false sense of security to most Americans. Even so, if you were to ask people on the street to be completely honest, they would tell you that “in their gut” they know something ain’t right.

They know.

They can feel that something has changed, that there IS a “fundamental transformation” happening in this country. It’s all happening too fast, isn’t it? The roller coaster is speeding up and going out of control in an election year, a year where Congress is usually on their best behavior.

It makes you wonder why.

Barack Obama recently appointed a Medicare Czar- a man named Donald Berwick- who will be running the Medicare system in our country. This should be big news to the millions of elderly folks who rely on Medicare, right? Evidently not. Most major news organizations- the same ones who spent a week investigating the rumor of Sarah Palin’s breast implants- ignored this story.

Why is this important? Well Donald Berwick is not your ordinary, guy. Like most of Obama’s czars, he doesn’t think in terms of the “free market” or capitalism. He’s a self-avowed socialist, a man who believes in redistribution of wealth, along with government rationing of health care. He was appointed by Obama in a controversial way, something called a “recess appointment” instead of undergoing the usual scrutiny of a Senate confirmation process.

It’s a rarely used, sneaky, backdoor way for Obama to get this man into his inner fold.

As Senator Mitch McConnell stated:

“As if shoving a trillion dollar government takeover of health care down the throat of a disapproving American public wasn’t enough, apparently the Obama Administration intends to arrogantly circumvent the American people yet again by recess appointing one of the most prominent advocates of rationed health care to implement their national plan. Democrats haven’t scheduled so much as a committee hearing for Donald Berwick but the mere possibility of allowing the American people the opportunity to hear what he intends to do with their health care is evidently reason enough for this Administration to sneak him through without public scrutiny.”

You see, Donald Berwick is a huge proponent of the health care system in Great Britain, the system which turns away women in labor, has a 6 times greater death rate from prostate cancer than the U.S., does not give certain life-saving drugs to breast cancer patients because of cost, and in the words of one researcher, “Have waiting lists for waiting lists.”

Hey, what’s not to like…?

While Germany and other western European countries have decent health care systems run by private insurance, Great Britain is unique in that it uses a system modeled on Lenin’s dream of universal ‘free’ provision- universal health care. This Soviet-style health care was pushed through years ago by a man named Nye Bevan. The ‘free provision’ ultimately destroyed private health care for most people and created the system they have in place today.

In a report called Delay, Denial, and Dilution, Laura Casper and David G. Green, describe the UK health care system this way: UK health care is cheap. They spend less on health care than does any comparable nation, but the cheapness of the NHS is subsidized by the exhaustion and demoralization of the staff and by the second-rate service it so often provides. It is the cheapness of the miser who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing. And it is a cheapness that demeans patients as supplicants and which hides the medical realities of rationing from them.

So Donald Berwick, a socialist, wants to bring a failing British, communist-inspired health care system into the United States. Why do the words “communist”, “socialist”, and “Obama’s Czars” all seem to tie together time and time again? Why would a man be inspired by a health care system that is CLEARLY subpar, one that rations care to the point of killing people?

And why would Obama WANT that man to run the elderly care in our country?

Berwick has stated publicly, “the decision is not whether or not we will ration care, the decision is whether we will ration with our eyes open.”

Hey seniors, how does it make you feel to know that the man who is now in charge of YOUR health care, YOUR life believes in rationing care? How do you feel about a President who would appoint a man- during a recess in Congress to avoid Senate hearings- to be in charge of YOUR body for the rest of your life?

How many of you believed Barack when he promised you that there would be no rationing under his health care plan?

Sadly, most seniors will be unaware of Mr. Donald Berwick because our press will keep this dirty little secret from them. They will turn on the Today Show and watch Matt Lauer make raspberry lemonade and show us how to tile our kitchen floor. They won’t understand the ramifications of Obama’s latest action until they go to an emergency room one day and are denied care.

By then it will be too late.

And for those of us who aren’t seniors, yet…we will be.

Obama just screwed ALL of us, young and old.

Our media is complicit in the rape.

lsm.
__________________________
go to Home Page: www.awakentheelephants.com

Category:Obama, communism, government policies, health care, lsm, political, redistribution of wealth, socialism | Comments (2) | Autor: lsm

Barack Sues Arizona

Thursday, 8. July 2010 7:50

The gloves are off. President Obama has declared war on the state of Arizona and Governor Jan Brewer because she’s dared to do something that he refuses to do- defend her state.

Hey, isn’t that a governor’s job? Isn’t that part of her job description?

Evidently not. You see, in Obama’s warped, little world, only the federal government should have power, only the federal government should have control. And if the federal government doesn’t find millions of illegal immigrants to be a strain on the economy, then neither should the individual states. Jan Brewer should just sit in her little governor’s office and wait for Obama to decide what’s best for Arizona.

After all, the country is best-run on the dictator’s timetable.

Yes, folks, we’ve about seen it all in the past couple of years, things we never have seen before. This latest lawsuit – The U.S. Justice Department vs. The State of Arizona- is only the latest in a line of head-scratchers that have been thrown our way. Our democrat-run congress just made history by “deeming” a $1.1 Trillion budget bill passed rather than hammering out a real budget.

Cowards all.

We watched a health care bill become law in a process that reeked of corruption, bribes, and skewed laws- not to mention that the bill thwarted the will of 60% of the people.

We’ve seen this same Justice Department, the one run by Eric Holder, dismiss an obvious case of voter intimidation by the Black Panthers as frivolous, although one of the lead prosecutors on the case said that it was a “slam dunk”, one of the easiest cases he had ever worked on.

Hey Eric, have you seen the video of these armed men in their uniforms calling the white citizens, “Crackers”?

We’ve watched as an oil spill has raged out of control while our President has golfed, entertained celebrities, vacationed, and flown all over the country on his “Summer of Recovery” tour. We’ve seen Governor Bobby Jindahl of Louisiana get slapped in the face from this same Obama administration when they refused to give timely federal aide to his state so he could try to save the coastline from certain ruin. The President also refused to lift the Jones Act which would have allowed ships from other countries to help with the cleanup.

I guess Governor Jindahl was supposed to sit in his little office and wait for the dictator to act, too.

The Arizona immigration law is due to take effect at the end of July. Here’s what’s important: Governor Brewer was very careful when crafting this law, knowing that the White House would challenge it. She made sure that her lawyers not only followed the constitution, but also stayed within the constraints of the current FEDERAL immigration laws. While Obama has given speeches claiming that this law will “racially profile” and “discriminate against those who look different”, nothing could be further from the truth. Case in point: The lawsuit put forth by Eric Holder does NOT assert that the Arizona law discriminates or profiles. It merely states that Arizona has no right to usurp federal law.

Once again, Obama is lying to the American people.

Anyone with an ounce of common sense would argue that if Obama won’t do his job by building a border fence and getting military aide to help control the rash of illegals who are crossing into Arizona everyday, then Governor Brewer needs to step in. Anyone with common sense knows that our economy cannot continue to envelop the numbers of illegals who are coming across the borders, stealing from the government dole through education, incarceration costs, and health care.

All Americans should be concerned that the city of Phoenix, Arizona has recently surpassed Bogota, Columbia in kidnappings and is now second only to Mexico City.

Shouldn’t we?

Governor Brewer, upon hearing news of the lawsuit, had this to say: ‘‘As a direct result of failed and inconsistent federal enforcement, Arizona is under attack from violent Mexican drug and immigrant smuggling cartels. Now, Arizona is under attack in federal court from President Obama and his Department of Justice. Today’s filing is nothing more than a massive waste of taxpayer funds.’’

Atta girl, Jan.

The cost of illegals in our country per year is $113 Billion according to the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). The cost to the individual states is a collective $84 Billion. Coincidentally, if you were to take the 48 states that are currently running budget deficits and add their deficits together, the number hits $90 Billion- about the same.

Huh.

Those who support the immigration bill are asking for the government to build the fence, fine employers who knowingly employ illegals, and deport those who are committing illegal activity in our country.

Liberal politicians who are against the new law pretend that they “care” about these illegal folks, but in reality, they only care about the potential votes they can get from this group. If this lawsuit was about racial discrimination, as Obama claims, then we would see a charge of discrimination within the lawsuit, which there is not. If this lawsuit was really about Arizona pre-empting the federal law, then wouldn’t the federal government file a lawsuit against EVERY sanctuary city who are directly defying federal law?

It’s all a smokescreen, folks.

You see, the average American, regardless of political view, seems to “get it” when it comes to illegals. Over 60% of the population agree with the Arizona bill, many of whom are asking their own state governors to enact similar measures. Even legal immigrants support the Arizona law because they came to this country to escape big government and socialism. 60% of Latinos in Colorado support a law similar to the one in Arizona for their own state.

They don’t want to see their new home look like the one they left behind.

We want a fence, Barack. When you told Senator John Kyl that you wouldn’t build the border fence because that would stop Congress from comprehensive immigration reform, that was an act against the federal laws of our land.

You should be ashamed.

But you won’t be. Nothing seems to impede your ideology. Nothing impedes your desire for power. You are a man on a mission, a mission that doesn’t allow something like the silly constitution or some good old-fashioned common sense get in the way.

You are a dictator, not a listener. You don’t respect us.

The November elections?…..They are personal, Barack. They are a mandate on you and what you are doing to our country. Every democrat who’s thrown from office will have you to thank.

We want our country back. We’re determined to get it.

lsm
___________________________
Go to Home Page: www.awakentheelephants.com

Category:Obama, Uncategorized, amnesty, constitution, illegal immigration, lsm, political | Comment (0) | Autor: lsm

“The People” Have Become Insignificant

Thursday, 24. June 2010 8:03

“Government of the people, by the people, and for the people.”

It’s become an old wives tale.

Anyone who still believes that President Obama cares about “the people” is collecting a government check.

This man cares about one thing: Executive Power.

Over 60% of the people were opposed to a Health Care Bill. Obama didn’t seem to hear any of us- He didn’t even recognize the hundreds of thousands of folks who went to Washington this past Fall and marched in his “backyard.” He and his minions were so intent on pushing their unwanted legislation through Congress that they threatened to use Reconciliation to pass it, a measure used only for budget purposes. When that plot was exposed, Obama then bribed Senators WITH OUR MONEY into voting for the bill. Many will rightly lose their jobs because of that vote.

The people spoke and Obama covered his ears.

The majority of Americans have also rejected Cap and Trade. When the EPA declared that CO2, the gas we exhale everytime we take a breath, is a known pollutant, most of us collectively laughed.

OK, “Americans” in Hollywood didn’t laugh.

Sean Penn and Leonardo Di Caprio held a flameless candlelight vigil, along with their mentor, Hugo Chavez.

Climategate dispelled the myth of An Inconvenient Truth and Michael Mann’s “hockey stick graph” and exposed a sinister plot that would redistribute wealth from the United States to other countries in the name of “global warming.” When Congress refused to push Cap and Trade legislation through, Obama went to the EPA and asked them to do the dirty work for him.

The EPA has now stated that if Cap and Trade doesn’t become law, then they will regulate CO2 themselves.

So much for checks and balances. Our Founders would be so proud.

We were told that Spain was the shining example of clean energy. They had implemented a carbon tax, along with “green” energy measures, and it was working beautifully. If America could only be more like Spain, then we, too, could be part of saving the planet.

Recently, reports have come out of Spain claiming that for every “Green Job” created, 2.2 private sector jobs are lost. The government cannot sustain the unemployment levels. Their economy is in such dire straits that it is predicted that they will be the next European country to fall.

Not to worry. Obama has it covered. As oil spews from the BP well in the Gulf, Obama is “not letting this crisis go to waste.” He’s once again pushing a Clean Energy bill- just like Spain. He ordered an illegal moratorium on all deep water drilling over 500 ft., something that the courts ruled was not within his power. He and his executive buddies are appealing the ruling.

They are suing to keep Americans out of work.

The people of America, and especially those who live on the Gulf, are screaming for Obama to listen.

He’s closed his ears to their pleas.

70% of Americans continue to oppose the immigration bill, many of whom are legal immigrants. Once again, Obama doesn’t appear to care.

The people have asked him to build the fence- we’ve given him our hard-earned money TO BUILD THE FENCE- and now we find out that he has no intentions of doing so. Sen. John Kyl of Arizona had a meeting with Obama where our president told him, “If I build the fence, then you people won’t work on comprehensive immigration reform.”

Translation: Obama ain’t building the damn fence.

Obama told the governor of Arizona that he would send her National Guard troops to help enforce the border. He has yet to fulfill that promise. Yet areas of Arizona, are so dangerous, signs have been posted which ask legal residents to stay away. One in four illegals who cross the border have a criminal record and the federal government is simply ignoring this issue. In fact, they are SUING Arizona over the recently passed state immigration bill, claiming that only the feds have the right to control immigration.

Americans are asking Obama to do something.

Does he listen? Well, it is now being reported in World Net Daily that our president may use little-known executive privileges called “deferred actions” and “parole” to grant amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants. These are measures (granted through the department of Homeland Security) that were intended to be used on a case by case basis in dealing with illegals, not as a way to give amnesty to the masses. They grant short-term deportation suspension and in many cases, allow the illegals to apply for employment authorization cards.

Of course, Obama doesn’t seem to care about the fine print when it comes to his agenda.

The ends justify the means.

Eight Republican Senators have sent Obama a letter warning him not to use deferred action to grant amnesty: “We understand that there’s a push for your administration to develop a plan to unilaterally extend either deferred action or parole to millions of illegal aliens in the United States,” they wrote in their letter. “We understand that the administration may include aliens who have willfully overstayed their visas or filed for benefits knowing that they will not be eligible for a status for years to come.”

They concluded their letter this way: “The administration would be wise to abandon any plans for deferred action or parole for the illegal population. Such a move would further erode the American public’s confidence in the federal government and its commitment to securing the borders and enforcing the laws already on the books.”

I’m not sure that the “public’s confidence” could be eroded any more than it already is…

Let’s face it: Our President doesn’t care. Americans can march in the streets, call congressional offices, attend Town Hall meeting, throw Tea Parties- and this man doesn’t blink an eye.

You see, “Government by the people” to Obama simply means , “Government by HIS people”- the people who want “fundamental change” of this country. We, the people, no longer have a role in this government- with amnesty and corruption in place, even our votes have become insignificant. And the legislative branch is no longer a necessary component of government.

The executive branch is now a dictatorship.

Welcome to a world of “hope and change.”

Welcome to “Obamaworld.”

lsm
__________________________
go to Home Page: www.awakentheelephants.com

Category:Obama, Uncategorized, amnesty, climate change, corruption, ethics, government policies, health care, illegal immigration, lsm | Comment (0) | Autor: lsm

Suspicious Facts Surrounding The Oil Spill

Tuesday, 22. June 2010 10:39

We’ve all heard the conspiracy theories…the second gunman in the grassy knoll, the “staged” moon landing, Bush bringing down the twin towers….

Most of these theories have no teeth, no factual evidence. They are theories of men with vivid imaginations which fall flat upon scrutiny.

What I’m about to tell you is NOT a conspiracy theory- it is a mere culmination of facts about the oil spill which point in a very suspicious direction. Glenn Beck laid out this evidence on his famous blackboard recently, backing it up with emails, data, and video clips. He encouraged his viewers to do their own homework and then spread the word, knowing that our mainstream media would not do their job and inform the people.

I’m attempting to inform you now…

Just so you know, it’s complicated.

It all starts with a man named George Soros, a billionaire who was born in Hungary and immigrated to the United States in the 1950′s. Soros made his fortune through investments and has used it to start and fund many leftist organizations including the Secretary of State Project, the Tides Foundation , Moveon.org, and the Center for American Progress. He spent $15.5 Million of his own money to try to defeat Bush in 2004, and millions to get Obama elected in 2008.

He’s a man of the Left- the FAR Left.

Soros admits in his autobiography that he was born into an anti-semetic, Jewish family and is now an atheist. Conservapedia reports that as a teenager, Soros “helped to cart off the stolen possessions of Hungarian Jewish men, women and children after they were rounded up and transported to death camps. He claims it never bothered him a bit, and still doesn’t bother him today.”

Enough said about his character.

In 2003, Soros developed the Center for American Progress (CAP) and hired John Podesta, a key player in the Clinton White House, to head it. You can understand how far-Left CAP is when you hear that radical Van Jones, the self-avowed communist resigned from his “Green Jobs Czar” position and was immediately hired to work under Podesta. The Center for American Progress has had a very cozy relationship with this Obama White House, in fact, Podesta was brought in after Obama’s election in 2008 to help form Obama’s cabinet and advisory team.

Many of the cabinet members and czars have Podesta to thank for their jobs.

This relationship is important because after the BP oil spill disaster, Podesta and CAP were suddenly VERY vocal about how the White House should handle the spill. Interestingly enough, the White House didn’t only listen to Podesta’s advice, they used it as a blueprint for their actions. Why would Podesta be interested in this particular crisis?

Why would Soros care about an oil spill?

Listen up. In August of 2009, Obama announced he was giving $2 billion in U.S. tax dollars to state-owned oil company Petrobras of Brazil for offshore oil drilling. At the same time, George Soros increased his stake $811 million in the same oil company.

How coincidental.

Oh, and another coincidence: The chief lobbyist for BP Oil is a man named Tony Podesta- the brother of John. So we have John and Tony Podesta both working throughout this crisis to get their individual agendas through to Obama. Tony Podesta also lobbies for NBC (owned by GE)- a company that has everything to gain if Obama pushes through his Cap and Trade Bill.

Hey, wait a minute. When Obama was visiting the Gulf, he was pushing Cap and Trade as a solution to our new energy crisis.

Weird, huh?

There’s more: Soros funds an activist organization called the Apollo Alliance, a group of radicals who were involved in writing the Stimulus Bill and the Cap and Trade Bill. That’s not all. BP Oil was also at the table when Cap and Trade was being crafted and have been strongly in favor of this legislation.

Why would an oil company WANT to tax energy and limit drilling?

It seems as if GE, NBC, Soros, Petrobras, and BP , among others, would ALL benefit if Cap and Trade goes through. Obama received large contributions from each of these entities during the election- in fact, “Big Oil” contributed more to Obama’s campaign than Bush’s campaign in 2004. Now Obama is using this crisis to push Cap and Trade- which would benefit these guys.

Coincidence?

A few weeks after the spill, an independent panel of experts was brought in as consultants. These experts presented our government with a signed list of recommendations for handling the disaster. Obama’s Secretary of the Interior, Ken Salazar, reviewed the document and then added a couple of paragraphs of his own, misleading everyone to believe that the experts had agreed to his new ideas which included a moratorium on drilling in the Gulf.

The experts were furious at this deception and Salazar was forced to apologize. These experts were NOT in favor of the moratorium, in fact, they believed that it was MORE dangerous to stop the drilling than to continue it and also pointed out that the economy of the Gulf would suffer greatly if drilling ceased.

Obama ignored their warning and ordered a ban on any American deep-water drilling over 500 ft. for at least 6 months.

Huh.

The strange thing about the drilling moratorium is that it will not only put about 80,000 Americans out of work, but these floatable oil rigs will leave the coast and find work in other countries where drilling is acceptable- places like Brazil. The chance of these rigs coming back to the United States in 6 months if we lift the drilling ban is nil.

Permanent job loss. Permanent economic damage to the Gulf.

Some of these rigs will now go to drill for Petrobras in Brazil….Hey, didn’t Obama just give $2 Billion to Brazil for deep-water drilling? And isn’t Petrobras the company that George Soros just invested heavily in?

Yup.

And while Obama is not allowing the United States to drill in water over 500 feet because it’s “too dangerous”, Petrobras, the company he’s financing with OUR money, is beginning to drill in water at a depth of 14,022 feet.

What the heck?

How can it be safe to drill in Brazil in 14,000 feet when it’s not safe to drill in America in 500 feet? It doesn’t make sense, does it?

And George Soros, the man who heavily funded Obama’s campaign, is going to reap billions when this Brazilian drilling begins.

Funny how a silly oil spill can benefit those close to Obama.

OK, not so funny.

Now Soros can fund even more of his leftist organizations that push socialist policy in America.

Which, in turn, will help get more socialists into elected office in the United States.

So he can rid our country of “evil capitalism”- the very source of all of his own money.

He can then use his money to continue to bring down our country, our culture, our economy, our way of living.

Cicero was right when he talked about “the enemy from within.”

That enemy? They now have access to the White House.

Some even live there.

lsm
______________________________
Go to Home Page: www.awakentheelephants.com

Category:Uncategorized | Comments (3) | Autor: lsm

Obama Admits to Muslim Faith

Wednesday, 16. June 2010 7:35

Oh, my. Our mainstream media seems to be ignoring their job again…..

Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs apparently has to do the dirty work for them. It seems that when nobody was looking (or reporting), the Egyptian Prime Minister of Egypt went on TV and told of an interesting exchange that he had with Barack Obama…

“There was a recent “Nile TV broadcast in which Egyptian Foreign Minister Abul Gheit said on the “Round Table Show” that he had had a one on one meeting with Obama who swore to him that he was a Moslem, the son of a Moslem father and step-son of Moslem step-father, that his half-brothers in Kenya were Moslems, and that he was loyal to the Moslem agenda. He asked that the Moslem world show patience. Obama promised that once he overcame some domestic American problems (Healthcare), that he would show the Moslem world what he would do with Israel.

This has been verified in the May 2010 issue of “Israel Today” in an article titled “Obama, a ‘Strategic Catastrophe,’” by Aviel Schneider:

The feeling among the Israeli public is that Obama is appeasing the Muslim world at the expense of Israel. “The American President told me in confidence that he is a Muslim,” said Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit on Nile TV.”

The author continues: “That could explain why Obama has instructed that the term “Islamic extremism” no longer be used in official government documents and statements. Furthermore, the US is now accusing Israel of harming American interests in the Middle East. General David Petraeus, the head of US Central Command, said Israel’s intransigence on resolving the conflict with the Palestinians is endangering US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. Even the US Congress considers Obama’s behavior toward Netanyahu humiliating. Three-quarters of the House of Representatives, 337 of 435 members, signed a bipartisan letter to Clinton expressing “deep concern over recent tension” between the two countries, and demanding that it be smoothed over quickly and in private.

It is presumed that the meeting between Obama and Gheit took place in January, 2010, when Gheit was visiting Washington DC . He was in town to convene with Hillary Clinton regarding MidEast Peace Talks on January 8, 2010.

So is Barack a Muslim or isn’t he?…..

Here’s what’s interesting. Barack attended school in Indonesia under the name Barry Soetoro when he was young. His religion was listed officially on school documents as “Islam.” At some point, when he was a young adult, he started to refer to himself as Barack Hussein Obama again.

He must have been proud of the name or he wouldn’t have changed back, right?

Yet, during the Presidential campaign, it was considered “racist” to use the name “Hussein” when saying Barack’s name. Why? Could it be that he wanted to distance himself from his Muslim name, knowing that America was not ready to elect a president with Islamic roots?

He’s never explained.

If Barack has denounced his Islamic faith, as he claims, then he is in danger for his life because Sharia Law states that anyone who leaves the Islamic faith is considered an “apostate”- and could face grave consequences. An article in the Christian Science Monitor explains it this way: “There are two types of apostates. The first type is murtad milli, one who converted to Islam and later renounced the faith. The second, and most egregious, type is murtad fitri. It refers to a person born of a Muslim father who renounces his birthright.

According to Islamic jurisprudence, children of a Muslim father – even an apparently nonpracticing one, such as Obama’s father, and irrespective of the mother’s faith – are automatically Muslims. Most Muslims around the world agree: A child of a Muslim father is a Muslim. Period.”

Those who leave the Islamic religion face death threats.

Does Obama seem frightened of those in the Middle East when he visits there? If he were a true “apostate”, a man who had left Islam, you would assume that we’d see extra security when Obama visits Islamic countries overseas. Instead we see Obama bowing to a Saudi Prince, quoting from the Koran in Cairo, placating the Palestinians, and turning his back on Netanyahu and the Jews time and time again. He’s gone out of his way to hire more Muslims to his administration, to proclaim that the United States is NOT a Christian Nation, to ignore the Islamic connection to the Fort Hood massacre, to handle Muslim terrorists from Gitmo with kid gloves, and to downplay the “terrorism” involved in the thwarted attacks by the panty bomber and the NYC car bomb.

Is he doing this because he is afraid for his life or because he is still sympathetic to the religion of Islam?

And why is he telling Egyptian Foreign Minister Abul Gheit that he is still a Muslim and will show the Muslim world what he will do with Israel in due time?

Why are we now promising $400 Million to the Palestinians, money we have to borrow from China, when there is no guarantee that the money won’t be used for weapons against Israel by the terrorist government, Hamas? Why are we joining with Turkey and supporting a UN inquiry into the flotilla incident when it seems clear through reports and film footage that Israel had every right to defend itself and protect its blockade?

Who is the real Barack Hussein Obama?

And 18 months into his presidency, why don’t we know?

The media is to blame, folks. They have stopped investigating and started worshiping at the altar of our President. They don’t seem to understand how important it is for this country to keep Sharia Law at bay. If Obama is a Muslim and is pushing a Muslim agenda, then the citizens of the United States have a right to know.

If Gheit is lying about his exchange with Obama, then wouldn’t you think that Obama would like to clear up the lies?

And if he’s not a Muslim, then why is he acting like one?

lsm
___________________________
Go to Home Page: www.awakentheelephants.com

Category:Islam, Obama, Uncategorized, lsm, religious, terrorism | Comments (1) | Autor: lsm